Free scoping call
What the planning condition asks and what the site is.
A planning authority or the Environment Agency can throw out analytical results that did not come from a UKAS-accredited laboratory. The report fails, and the investigation you already paid for has to be done again.
Services are traced before anything intrusive, and analysis goes to an accredited laboratory.
Preliminary risk assessment from historical, geological and regulatory sources.
See the programWindow sampling, boreholes and trial pits, after buried services are located and proved.
See the programSampling and assessment against the current risk management framework.
See the programReports to discharge planning conditions, with the sampling limitations stated plainly.
See the programStart with the desk study, trace and prove buried services before anything intrusive, send samples to an accredited laboratory, and state in every report what the sampling cannot tell you.
What the planning condition asks and what the site is.
Sometimes it concludes no drilling is needed.
Or stopped, if they cannot be located.
Named laboratory, and the limitations stated.
Quoted per site after a scoping conversation. Laboratory analysis is billed at cost through the accredited laboratory.
Preliminary risk assessment, before any drilling.
Desk study, intrusive works, analysis and reporting.
Said plainly, because it protects the report.
Every engagement is quoted after a free consultation. No subscription.
Terra Analytical UK Ltd is a private limited company registered in England and Wales under company number 14329724, based at Feering near Colchester in Essex and trading since September 2022. The work is test drilling and boring together with environmental consulting: desk studies, site investigation, contamination assessment and reporting for planning.
Two things determine whether an investigation was money well spent. The first is where the analysis was done. A planning authority or the Environment Agency can reject analytical data that did not come from a laboratory holding UKAS accreditation, and for soils operating within the relevant certification scheme — so a report built on cheap analysis fails and the work is repeated at the client's cost. We are not an accredited testing laboratory ourselves, we do not claim to be, and we will tell you which accredited laboratory our samples go to. The second is what happens before the rig turns: buried services are traced and proved, and if they cannot be located satisfactorily we stop. Every report also states that sampling characterises discrete points on given dates and cannot certify a site free of contamination.
Because a regulator can reject the data. Analytical results normally need to come from a laboratory holding UKAS accreditation, and for soil analysis operating within the Environment Agency's certification scheme. If they do not, the report built on them can be refused, and the investigation has to be done again. We use an accredited laboratory and we will name it for you.
No, and we are careful not to imply it. We are a consultancy and a drilling contractor, not a testing laboratory. The accreditation that matters for your data sits with the independent laboratory we submit samples to, and we will tell you which one and what its scope covers. A consultancy claiming laboratory accreditation it does not hold is exactly what gets a report challenged.
Only once buried services have been located and proved. Striking a live cable or a gas main is the real hazard in this work and the consequences are not recoverable. If the records are poor and we cannot satisfactorily locate services, we will not drill — and we would rather tell you that now than on the day.
No, and no honest consultancy will. An investigation characterises conditions at the locations sampled on the dates sampled. Ground varies between those points, and made ground in particular varies a great deal. Every report we produce says that explicitly rather than hiding it in an appendix, because a developer relying on a false sense of certainty is the one who gets hurt.
Not always, and the desk study is what tells us. A proper historical and geological review sometimes concludes that the risk is low enough that intrusive work is not required, and we will report that even though it is a smaller fee. Starting with drilling before the desk study is how money gets spent in the wrong places.
Work stops and we tell you in writing. Asbestos in soil is a real and increasingly common finding, and it changes both the assessment and the way the material has to be handled. Sampling and any removal go through the proper regime, with licensed contractors where the work is licensable.
A free scoping conversation and a written quotation, with the scope set out.